That wasn't a question. It was how Gary McCaleb, of the Alliance Defense Fund, defined the group whose religious beliefs he thought should be favored by force of law.
I read it in this Associated Press article in the New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/...
Ariz. Bill Could Require Reason for Birth Control
The proposed bill is Arizona-style obnoxious enough. But this really caught my attention:
"A national advocacy group for social conservatives, the Alliance Defense Fund, said the current opt-out provision is too restrictive.
"The bill would end uncertainty about "who is sufficiently religious to have their rights of conscience protected," said Gary McCaleb, a lawyer for the Arizona-based group." [Emphasis added]Well, the right wing theocrats are emboldened enough to be frank about their agenda.